Dundon v. U.S. Bank, et al. (S.D.Ill. No. 01-CV-408-GPM).
In this case, plaintiffs alleged that certain Illinois second mortgage loans that were secured by real property located in Illinois were assigned to, among others, U.S. Bank. These loans allegedly contained interest rates and fees that violated Illinois lending law. After conducting discovery throughout the country, the Illinois class was certified, over defendants’ objection, and defendants’ petition for review from the 7th Circuit was denied. Thereafter, the parties agreed to a settlement in the amount of approximately $30,000,000.00 which was approved by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. Significantly, Mr. Buxner was appointed co-lead in this case as part of the certification and later for settlement purposes.
Cates, et al. v. U. S. Bank National Association, N.D. (D.C. Hennepin Cty., Minn, 4th Judicial District).Evan Buxner was one of several lead counsel in this litigation challenging the legality of certain settlement fees imposed in connection with residential second mortgage loans. The litigation involved multiple class actions filed on behalf of borrowers in numerous state and federal courts throughout the country.
The case ultimately settled for approximately $30,000,000.00.
Andrews v. Express, (St. Clair County, Illinois Circuit Court, Case No. 03L479).
Evan Buxner was counsel for plaintiffs in Illinois alleging violations of state minimum wage laws by this clothing manufacturer and retailer. The parties ultimately entered into a multi-state settlement in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania valued in multi-seven figures.
Mohme v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. (St. Clair County, Illinois Circuit Court, Case No. 03L0448).
Evan Buxner was counsel for plaintiffs in Illinois alleging violations of state minimum wage laws by this clothing manufacturer and retailer. The parties ultimately entered into a multi-state settlement that will be effectuated in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania valued in multi-seven figures.
In Re: Baycol Litigation
Since 2001, Mr. Buxner has prosecuted and settled millions of dollars worth of claims on behalf of individuals who ingested the pharmaceutical drug Baycol linked to the severe muscle disorder rhabdomyolysis. Mr. Buxner represented these individuals who lived in numerous states, and in cases filed in Illinois and Missouri.
In Re: Vioxx Litigation
Since 2004, Mr. Buxner has been representing and prosecuting cases on behalf of individuals injured by the dangerous pharmaceutical drug Vioxx. Vioxx is a COX-2 inhibitor used to treat arthritis and pain that was withdrawn from the marker because it caused an increase risk of deadly heart attacks and strokes.
In Re: Fen-Phen Litigation
The FDA withdrew the dangerous diet drugs Pondimin, Fen-Phen and Redux in 1997 because use of the drugs caused severe heart valve problems. For years, Mr. Buxner has been successfully representing individuals who suffered valve heart disease and primary pulmonary hypertension often called PPH across the country.
In Re: Bextra Litigation
Since 2004, Mr. Buxner has been representing and prosecuting cases on behalf of individuals injured by the dangerous pharmaceutical drug Bextra. Bextra is a COX-2 inhibitor used to treat arthritis and pain that was withdrawn from the marker because it caused an increase risk of deadly heart attacks and strokes. Mr. Buxner also represents individuals who suffered severe rashes, blistering, Stevens Johnson Syndrome and tens after indigestion the drug.
Call the offices of Evan D. Buxner today at 1-888-725-0503 or, email us for a free initial consultation to discuss your case and your rights under the law.
|
